Organized Stalking and Victim’s Families

This is probably the nastiest part of these Organized Stalking campaigns.

That is, the intentional targeting of the victims family in order to isolate the victim from their family and close social circle of relatives.

The company is engaging in criminal collusion in this campaign and has now made their first moves in this direction. They’ve brought in new skanks who have not been fully enlightened (who knows what nonsense they’ve been told); they are in other work areas of the company so haven’t seen the abuse; and they have been instructed not to say irrational or loony things to me so that I won’t cut them off.

They’ve just been instructed to ask “friendly” questions like where I’m from, who my relatives are, etc.

One even accessed my main blog and downloaded the old picture I have posted there of my great-grandmother, grandfather, father and uncles.

The Reitman cult is desperate. They’ve been persecuting me for over 40 years and still not managed to completely isolate me because they’re ignorant fools.

Now, that they have the terrorist Santokh Singh Bagga and his relatives smearing me and engineering persecution campaigns in the Indian community, they’ve decided they’re going to make their move with my relatives now.

While Bagga claims to be a CSIS informant and claims to have been "helping" CSIS with their investigations into Air India, the facts tell a very different story:

1. Bagga never gave CSIS anything useful in terms of information despite the fact that he was in the Inner Circles of the Babbar Khalsa.
2. Bagga never testified at the trials of any of those charged with the Air India crimes.
3. The Vancouver Journalist who exposed Bagga as a pathological liar and was murdered for his trouble was murdered by Bagga's son. Bagga's son claims that a member of Babbar Khalsa helped him.

On the other hand, my cousin was the lawyer representing the Air India victims families in India.

So, who's the terrorist here? The answer is blatantly obvious and ironically it's the terrorist who's living the high life under the protection of the RCMP at the tax payers expense.

Meanwhile I'm being maliciously persecuted by a wealthy, well-connected and completely deranged psychopath, also, often at the tax payers expense because of his and his skanks fraudulent misappropriation of government funds and resources.

And not an RCMP Officer in sight to help me or even give a damn.

Canadians are now paying millions for Bagga to hang out in comfort at the tax payers expense in Witness Protection when the Babbar Khalsa would probably welcome him with open arms. In other words, there's no threat to that terrorists life nor has there ever been since he apparently never revealed any of their secrets.

So, I'm not surprised that the Reitman cult brought him out of the woodwork after the Air India hearings a couple of years ago.

They're both terrorists and the instigators of murders. They have that in common.

Anyway, targeting my family like this is something they've done in the past as well but have always been careful because they're chickenshits and were afraid of my Uncle and the relatives involved in his organization.

Now, presumably they think they're safe and they've decided to come out from under their rocks and make their move. 

The purpose of this is two-fold. To pick up personal information about me that they can use against me (there isn't any); to smear me to my family; all in order to isolate me so that they can get away with their pathological lies and abuse without being concerned that anyone will come forward to expose them for the liars and abusers that they are.

I continue to be amazed that this company doesn't think this behavior is nuts.

To hire someone for no other than reason than to maliciously persecute them because of some lies you've heard and because you've been offered lucrative contracts or money is pretty sick and somewhat sadistic.

Perhaps the Reitman cult should get Psycho Cyril and Dotty Dorothy some serious counseling?

Oh. They won't. Because they're almost as loony as their relatives.

Anyone (like this company) who goes along with their frauds eventually ends up paying the price for that themselves and it's never because of anything I've done. It's always because the Reitman cult has bribed/extorted them into doing something criminal and then hung them out to dry after they're done because someone looked at them the wrong way. Of course, they always blame me for it.

The only people I'm doing anything to is the Reitman cult itself. I ignore the skanks and the corporate whores and basically just have contempt for them.

And all I'm doing to the Reitman cult is exposing their scams when I come across them.

If they want me to stop doing that they can stop maliciously persecuting me.

Since they're psychopaths that won't happen so I'll continue exposing their scams.

Weaseling, weaseling and more weaseling….

The reason my nickname for Psycho Cyril is the “Weasel” is because he really is a little weasel.

The whackjob comes up with numerous ways of weaseling his way out corners.

I’ve forced him and the other members of the Reitman cult into a corner where their medical scam is concerned and so now in order to weasel their way out the corner they are trying to set me up to make it appear as though I’m the one posting bullshit to my own medical records.

I went to an appointment yesterday and here’s what happened.

1. I am taken into the examination room by the medical assistant.

2. She logs in to the computer and then leaves but shuts the door on her way out.

Why shut the door? When you’re the victim of deranged organized stalkers you have to question each and every “different” thing they do no matter how minor it appears because these little oddities are almost always done for a reason.

3. Five minutes later the Doctor comes in presumably giving me time to access the computer.

Of course, I didn’t touch it. I never intentionally give these lunatics anything to use against me. They’ll have to lie and when they do they’ll be risking getting caught in their lies.

4. The appointment was the second one with this Doctor that proceeded normally. The only other normal one of the many I’ve had with this Doctor was the first one. Unfortunately there’s no point switching doctors since they are all bullied or incited into cooperating with this scam.

As one person told me, “there are a lot of scary people following you around”.

If I proceed with a law suit then I’ll find another doctor.

5. He gave me my prescription and left quickly closing the door behind him despite the fact that I was following him out.

Normally the door is left open until the doctor enters the examination room and then it’s closed.

My guess? Psycho Cyril and his whackjob Reitman cult is planning to claim that I’m the one putting crazy notes on my file so that I can sue them.

This tactic is typical of Psychopaths. They almost consistently take the approach of blaming the victim for the crime and alleging that they’re the victims.

So, a psychopath will stalk you, and then when they either get caught or think they’re going to be caught they pre-empt everything by falsely accusing their victims of stalking them.

The fact is that I am well within my rights to file law suits against people who engage in criminal activities against me which have an impact on my daily life, result in loss of opportunities, and cost me money to name just a few of the damages these lunatics are responsible for.

This is why they’re desperately trying to get into my apartment.

They want to remove evidence which supports my medical and other claims that I’m making that they have engaged in fraudulent and criminal tampering of my government records.

And this is why when they do succeed in breaking in, I’m going to catch them.

Their biggest problem is that they are stupid and they screw up seriously. When they screw up they have to cover up.

For example, a week or so ago, Simon pretended to blow up at me over a typo and his refusal to answer my explicit questions regarding a project.

He told me to “Shut up and listen to him”. I responded with “Shut up and answer my question.” This occurred in full hearing and view of the entire floor.

Now the fact is that Simon is responsible for setting up my projects and giving me what I need to do them. His behaviour was bullying, disrespectful and completely unbecoming and unacceptable in any normal civilized work place.

My response was a natural response to being bullied and insulted publicly by a superior.

So, what does Simon do? He complains that we can’t work together. In other words the poor, poor bully is the victim here because I stood up to him.

Of course we can’t work together when he’s being a bully, yelling at me, refusing to give me the information I need to do my job and taking every minor legitimate issue that occurs and grossly exaggerating it way out of proportion. He does this quite regularly and others also line up with petty complaints about typos (in documents not in software) and other minor irrelevant issues most of which I wasn’t responsible for in the first place.

So now I’m working with Shaun and Shaun has to deal with the fact that Simon was abusive. Shaun will weasel out of this abuse by claiming that certain people are like that and they just put up with it and nobody complains.

By doing that he is setting it as an acceptable standard and implicitly making the victim (me) responsible not only for Simon’s abusive behaviour but for any action the company ultimately takes (if they take any) which will be against me not against Simon.

In addition, Lilliana will probably work with Simon as the alleged evidence that he can get along with other people and she will be praised to the skies for her ability to "handle" Simon when the reality is simply that Simon hasn't been told to persecute Lilliana. He's been told to persecute me.

Of course, the corner Shawn's painted himself into and is going to have to lie about is the fact that I wasn’t the one who complained about this. Simon did. And the fact that Simon violated the Anti-Bullying legislation with his behaviour.

The standard for the legislation isn’t what’s reasonable and acceptable in that workplace but what is reasonable and acceptable by normal standards.

Now I don’t doubt that Psycho Cyril and his skanks would like it to be the way they imagine it in their delusions and have probably told the company that is the way it is, but of course, normal people know it isn’t.

And this is where they always end up tripping over their lies and inconsistencies and this is where they’re going to get nailed when they make their move to claim that I’m mentally ill because I allegedly can’t get along with abusive bullies.

The fact is that I have made an effort to "get along" with this abusive bully by not taking his abuse seriously and refusing to give him any satisfaction by indicating that he may have succeeded in upsetting me. And I know that since all of this is intentional I won't accomplish anything by complaining about his abusive bullying behavior anyway since any complaint I make will be used against me not to bring him into line.

In other words, if I complain, everything's my fault because I complained, if I don't complain everything's my fault because I didn't complain.

Workplace Bullying at it's finest.

More Workplace and Community Harassment. What else is new?

Thank you to my friends for emailing and posting and asking how I’m doing. 

Apologies for not posting but as you know I go through times when it's just too difficult to keep writing about the abuse day in and day out. I need to take mental breaks to protect my sanity.

Follows is a summary of my responses to the personal emails.

No, they haven’t fired me or laid me off yet but they appear to be setting the stage to “deal with me”. It looks like the Reitman cult has convinced the company that it would be a good idea to make me appear to be “nuts” so that they can just call in the guys in white coats to cart me off publicly.

Now that I’ve said this publicly, I’m assuming that they’ll try to make me look like a liar and withdraw. That would be nice. ;-D.

I’ve already seen signs that they may be withdrawing on this one but just in case they aren’t I’ll let the cat out of the bag, so to speak.

The biggest problem the Reitman cult faces is that they’re pathological liars and that none of what they are saying about me is true. So when they want to incite hatred against me it becomes quite difficult.

The fact is that I don’t do or say anything that could remotely be described as “nuts” and I don’t allow their skanks to twist my words to make it appear as though I agree with their nutty remarks and paranoid delusions. Nor do I do anything illegal or criminal.

The result of this is that the only option left to them is to commit criminal and illegal acts to steal my identity and then use that theft to commit criminal and illegal acts in my name or to frame me in other ways like stealing my car and have someone impersonating me commit criminal, illegal or otherwise harassing acts.

And, of course, this is exactly the way I want it to be. I told my ex years ago that I would never do anything illegal because I wanted to force them into making a choice. Stop the malicious persecution or commit criminal, illegal acts in order to perpetuate this.

This gives me the upper hand because they are always vulnerable to getting caught.

This is also why they’ll never sue me for writing this blog and naming them. I’m telling the truth and they’re vulnerable.

Anyway, back to the job. Liliana, a new hire, has taken on the role of skank, joined me for lunch and tried to embroil me in loony discussions much like the other skank tried to do. I am avoiding her just like I am avoiding the other skank. And yes, she's being treated better than me, but I'm ignoring it and frankly don't care. I find it quite amusing that a company would pay me 65,000 a year for the privilege of malicious persecuting me.

It’s considered a sign of insanity to repeat the same action over and over when you know it’s going to fail. That would describe the Reitman cult and their skanks quite accurately. They don’t seem to be capable of learning or it takes them a long time to clue in.

Recently scientists, based on various studies, are concluding that the ability to reason requires empathy therefore Psychopaths are generally limited in their ability to engage in any kind of reason never mind complex social reasoning. This would explain a lot where the Reitman cult is concerned and their apparent social retardation. Ironically, loony Lorna has her degree in Sociology. Lol.

Anyway, in a lame attempt to deal with the problem of me not being mentally ill and not falling for their absurd scams, Liliana has started making paranoid remarks like she doesn’t want to go out to lunch because she’s afraid someone will “spit in her food”, amongst other things. Then everyone convinces her to go so she goes. When Liliana asked me to go and I said no, she was being “understanding”. I didn’t give a reason but she was implying she already knew and “got it”.

Of course, my real reason has to do with the fact that I’m trying to lose weight and eating at restaurants undermines that process. If I wanted to join them all I would have to do is suggest a buffet.

I expect that Liliana’s paranoid remarks will be falsely attributed to me when they are ready to make their sleazy move, if they decide to proceed.

Making this particular remark, of course, is to cover for their criminal assaults of bribing restaurants to tamper with my food. A fact that could be easily proven if they weren’t also bribing the medical labs and doctors in my community to participate.

And note, that I don't talk about this stuff at work because I know perfectly well that they will use that against me to allege that I'm nuts.

The only nuts here are the ones that are inciting restaurant owners to do commit these crimes and it's just a matter of time before I nail them on this one. They know it and that's precisely why they're trying to build a false case that I'm mentally ill and it's also why they don't dare sue me. Too many people have participated actively in this malicious persecution campaign and know that I'm telling the truth whether they have been successfully incited to hate me or not.

The Reitman cult incites cooperation with this malicious persecution by stealing my identity (copying my drivers licence, medical card, bank cards, etc.) and then impersonating me in order to frame me for engaging in harassing behavior against the doctors, medical labs, restaurants, banks, and any other business that I might deal with.

Once they convince the professionals or business that I’m allegedly harassing them, it’s easy for them to incite the professionals or business into harassing me.

Someone had been digging around in my purse a month or so ago at work, and I’m assuming it was my boss since I doubt anyone else could do it without being questioned. I work in an open area where everyone can see what’s going on at my desk. This would have given him access to my bank cards, drivers license, medical card, etc.

Shawn, my boss, has been on vacation for the past two weeks and this time he made a point of telling me where he was going, that he was flying and when he was leaving. One of the false allegations that the Reitman’s spread about me is that I allegedly call the airlines and make threats in order to to disrupt the flights. Shawn can now “support” that false claim since the Reitman cult will disrupt his flights given that they probably told him to tell me so that they could “prove” their lies were true.

Shawn was quite paranoid at Christmas and didn’t tell me anything which was fine with me. I don’t care where he goes or what he does and I don’t appreciate being falsely accused of criminal acts through smear campaigns.

Other Going Ons:

During the previous week no-one was sitting outside my apartment. Unusual given all of the recent activity.

Usually when it goes quiet, it's because the Reitman cult is running one of their malicious persecution training workshops. Yes. Believe it or not, they actually have them. Psychopaths are narcissists so I don’t doubt psycho Cyril gets off on this.

This week the guy has returned.

The Skank Superintendent has been trying to get into my apartment again. Last week and this week.

She's posted signs asking people not to "smoke in the halls and that theft will be dealt with" so I'm assuming she's spreading some malicious lie about me allegedly stealing something and using her brilliant investigative skills to determine that it must have been me since there was probably allegedly a smoke smell in the hallway. Just guessing but this sort of thing would be typical.

This will be her "rationale" for criminally and illegally entering my premises without my permission. However, I’m not making it easy for her and as far as I know she hasn’t succeeded.

The fact is that she already stole from my apartment when there was construction work going on and I let her in. So the most likely culprit in any apartment thefts is going to be her.

Although I suspect that there was no theft and the person will be paid for lying about it and falsely blaming me for it, through an Insurance scam. This is how they’ve typically pulled this stunt off in the past. I don’t doubt loony Lorna has lots of advice to give on this one given her history.

On the other hand, if the Skank Superintendent did succeed in breaking into my apartment and did steal something valuable from me, like my computer, I’d have trouble getting the Insurance to cover it.

I bought apartment insurance this year and the company is already falsely claiming that I didn’t pay. So that stage is already set.

Too bad the moron is too stupid to get in … so far. The Reitman cult is quite forceful though (through either bribery or blackmail also known as extortion) and that results in their skanks being persistent.

So, I doubt her criminal and illegal attempts to break into my apartment are over.

Since this is the Friday 13th weekend and "special" to psycho Cyril I expect I'll be framed for something or other. And I expect the cops will start following me around again on Monday as a result of whatever frame-up the Reitman cult has engaged in.

Simon, the guy I work with and who is supposed to be providing me with the information I need to do my job (and isn’t) is going completely paranoid. Something the Reitman cult likes to incite because then it's easier for them to incite him to harass me.

I've been going to my car when I really feel the need for a smoke and just lying and saying that I have a private phone call to make. I do this because if I go out back to the Smoking area they will falsely accuse me of vandalizing Simon's car and then vandalize mine. They've done that once already.

When I did that on Thursday, Simon freaked out and asked me if I was threatening him. LOL!

These people are completely nuts.

On the one hand, they maliciously persecute me and slander me by claiming I'm "mentally ill", and on the other hand, they are so paranoid that I can't even go and sit in my car for 5 minutes because they think I'm "out to get them".

Simon may well be the one to end up in the Psych ward the way he’s going.

Week 12. The Sabotage continues…

Someone allegedly took down the company web site last week and previous to this there was an alleged attempt to get into the company firewall.

Assuming that I believe that this happened at all and that it was a genuine attack (which I don't necessarily) I can point them to exactly who the culprits might be. The people who should be investigated (if the attack was legitimate and the company wasn't just lying or did it to themselves) would be:

1. Doug Salomon, MIJO Corporation
2. Graham Carl Marko, 3DConnect
3. David Williams, WorleyParsons

They're all pretty stupid and I've caught them hacking my network so I don't doubt that they would be easy to catch if they did it.

However, one of the scams that the Reitman cult engages in is to play the victim. They frame me and then they use that frame up to rationalizing inciting hatred and attacks against me. They also train all of their corporate whores/skanks in that methodology.

On the other hand, if one of their corporate whores/skanks starts to go soft, they will often do something seriously ugly to them and then falsely accuse me of having done it, just keep the hatred incited. If this is what occurred, any one or all of three people listed above were involved and possibly some of their personal cohorts in crime.

The car incident a week or so ago is a good example. I innocently went out for a smoke. Someone followed me out and may or may not have done something to Simon's car. Simon pretended something was done to his car and pretended to wonder why I would do such a thing since it happened around the time I was outside. This was the point of him asking me if I was "mad at him".  Then my car got vandalized. My tires were leaking air and coincidentally the places where I usually fill the air (en route to work) had air pumps that were all "out of order" all week. The front drivers side tire has been damaged to the point where it will require fixing since air is pouring out around the plug whenever I try to fill it. This is why I've had to replace all of my tires 5 times now in a 10 year period.

My co-workers also seem to be intensifying the sabotage of my work and getting much more blatant about it. They don’t seem to care if I know and of course they turn around and imply all sort of ugly things about me while at the same time being “encouraging”.

Essentially the way it works is this.

1. I’m assigned a job and I do it.
2. I test it and it works.
3. I tell Simon or Vitali or Shawn or the QA people that it’s ready.
4. They sabotage it. Either on the database side or the software side. It doesn’t take much. Just remove a setting or a character in the code or database and nothing will work.
5. I show it to them and it doesn’t work.
6. I point out it was working before.
7. They pretend to look skeptical but imply it's not a big deal while making "jokes" about me being on drugs.
8. I fix it and it starts all over again.

Of course the point of all of this is to get a reaction out of me (which isn’t going to happen). No-one there is innocent. They all know the scam so there’s absolutely no point in me even trying to defend myself.

I’ll take care of doing that when it matters and when it will be effective like in a court of law. Although I haven't bothered trying to sue the skanks. They're not worth my time or trouble.

I'll sue the members of the Reitman cult when that opportunity comes my way. I'm not interested in anything less than that.

What’s really insane is that these lunatics don’t think what they’re doing to me is insane or even wrong.

No doubt that one can argue that maybe I really am screwing up and I’m not claiming that I have been perfect. There were a couple of screw ups that were mine and I take responsibility for my part in them. However, even they occurred because of misdirection so the entire blame can’t be put on my shoulders for those one’s either. I should have know better than to fall for that misdirection and I put that down to stress. Yes, stress can cause these types of issues as well but again we’re back to them. If they weren’t doing what they’re doing I wouldn’t be stressed.

How can I be sure that this isn’t just me and that I’m not just rationalizing my own issues?

Because this doesn’t happen anywhere where the Reitman cult and their skanks aren’t operating and/or influencing.

I have no weirdness or lunacy in my life whatsoever when this cult isn’t sticking their noses into things.

I handle numerous issues on my own when I develop my own software and rarely, if ever, have to go back and fix things. In fact, I have very few bugs at all in my software.

So, there’s a clear and demonstrable pattern here.

Reitman cult and their corporate whores/skanks = workplace/community bullying, sabotage and harassment.

Ironically, when this is occurring, the company owners are quite unconcerned about the fact that they’re paying me a salary while their staff is sabotaging my work and I’m accomplishing exactly nothing.

Why would they be concerned since they’re benefiting in numerous other ways by engaging in this criminal collusion with the Reitman cult.

My company just got named one of the top 50 best managed companies in Canada.

Funny how criminal collusion with the Reitman cult almost always nets the corporate whores/skanks some award, the associated publicity, and the benefits of new contracts, etc. or just plain cash and/or a good job.

In fact if you look at the lists of people who win the various “Order” medals, very few are actually known to Canadians and almost all have done nothing special worth mentioning to get their medals. 

These awards used to actually mean something at one time and were a measure of one’s accomplishments or successes. They almost always went to Canadians who were well known in their particular area of expertise.

Today, it seems, that they are simply rewards for abuse of power and corruption or a present to a committee members buddy.

After all, both Dotty Dorothy and Loony Lorna have won them as well.

Anyway, this week is Week 13, and my three month probationary period is over next week on March 12.

13 is Cyril's special number. He obsesses over it and always tries to arrange his biggest scams on or immediately around the 13th of the month. Especially if it's a Friday the 13th.

How much do you want to bet that I get dumped and that this weeks intensified sabotage of my work will be the rationale for dumping me. Of course, after I've gone, there will be numerous "incidents" which I will be falsely accused of having done as well.

What can I say other than the lunatics have taken over the asylum.

Week 11. A Frame Up

They finally got their opportunity to do a frame-up.

I made the mistake of going out for a smoke and lo and behold a guy came out just as I was going on, deeply engaged in reading a text on his smart phone.

An hour later, Simon, (bad actor) looks at me “forlornly” and asks me if I’m “mad at him about anything”. I said no and asked him why he would think that. He just carried on with his fake “forlorn” look and didn’t respond.

The guy who was coming out as I was coming in from having my smoke wasn’t someone that I had ever seen before except at lunch time the previous Friday. He and Danny (the cleaner whose job it is to apparently clean everyone’s desks except mine) followed me out at lunch time and drove off, returning at exactly the same time as me.

Now, they had no way of knowing that I would go out for a smoke that day so someone had to have told this guy and that someone could only have been Simon unless someone overheard me telling Simon I was going for a smoke. Given Simon’s clearly skanky behaviour I’m pretty sure it was him.

Simon parks his brand new car, a Suburu, in the back. As I mentioned previously he insisted on going with me for lunch one day and insisted on taking his car. This, of course, was to ensure that I knew where it was parked and what kind of car it was so that I could be framed.

Unfortunately, the opportunity hasn’t arisen since then because I haven’t been going out for a smoke during the day. Until now that is. And he leapt on the opportunity, it seems since the smoking area is also in the back.

No surprise that the tires on the drivers side of my car are now leaking. This is their phony justification for vandalizing my car.

Simon also continues the game playing where the work assignments are concerned. The entire Test environment is incorrectly configured or there is something key missing on one of the servers. I have been troubleshooting it but don’t have the information I need to do it.

He’s given me “documentation” on how it was set up but since everything in the documentation has been done I have to assume that there is also something crucial missing in the documentation.

I’ve been toning down my public support for Anonymous by being a little more low key about so it will be difficult for them to use it against me.

I’m not hacking and if I was I would get caught because my ISP illegally monitors my communications.

However that won’t stop the Reitman cult from framing me, spreading false allegations about me and ensuring that I’m falsely accused so that they can justify illegally violating my privacy.

The new legislation that Toews is trying to get through will make everything the Reitman cult has been doing illegally, legal as long as they can convince police officers to do it for them. An easy task when you consider the number they have on their personal payroll.

And if Toews is gone we have Fantino to look forward to. In my opinion, Fantino is a frothing at the mouth little nazi lunatic and a criminal who thinks he’s above the law. He won’t need legislation to violate the law. He’ll just do it, law or not.

So, getting Toews out isn’t the solution. The solution is to block the entire agenda of the Harper Conservatives. Their election fraud has opened that door for us. Focusing on Harper and those he’s enabling will be far more effective than just dumping Toews who probably did act out of ignorance as he claims and isn’t a frothing at the mouth lunatic.

I don’t doubt that the Reitman cult would love to take advantage of this opportunity and get Toews out of the way so that their loony tunes cult member Fantino can have control over Canada’s entire Security, Policing and Intelligence services which will effectively give this Cult control over those agencies.

This will result in the corrupt being promoted, the ethical being maliciously persecuted and driven out and gross abuse of power as well as fraudulent misappropriation of government funds to further the personal agenda of the Reitman cult.

Our entire democratic system in Canada is being undermined by this cult and those they influence.

Week 10. Last Resorts

Well, this week started out with me getting very sick including having a fever.

Anyway, essentially a hostile and slanderous environment is being created which I’ve been dealing with.

Slander One. I have learning issues (am stupid):

I managed to get through Monday and despite my mental fog pointed out to Simon that what he was asking me to do was unnecessary. I provided him with a simple method once I figured out what it actually was that he was trying to do.

This, of course, took all day since Simon couldn’t be bothered to tell me what the point of his request was and what actual problem I was supposed to be working on resolving. He’s playing the “I’m ignorant and I don’t speak english well” character to the hilt. His entire approach is “I’m so stupid I want you to do what I ask in the stupidest way possible and since you’re too stupid to read my mind and comprehend what I need to have done without me telling you then you obviously have a learning problem.”

Anyway, I had already put a kibosh on the shit they’ve been shovelling about my alleged learning “difficulties” by scoring 100% on AODA Training program and Quiz that all new employees are required to pass now apparently.

I also managed to get through testing one item without any problems since it was software written by someone else and he had provided all of the necessary information (not a myriad of useless and irrelevant details) to do what I needed to do.

There are issues with the other environment but those seem to be related to the configurations there. And Simon, of course, isn’t going to enlighten me on what I need to know to figure those out.

Apparently I’m supposed to hack all my knowledge together to figure things out rather than be trained in anything or given any relevant information or given the information after the fact and after I’ve wasted days on trying to resolve a problem that I don’t have the necessary information to resolve. And apparently if I can’t do this I must be “stupid”. And note that I don’t even know what I should look for most of the time since they haven’t even given me the information I need to determine that either.

Workplace Bullying and Harassment at it’s finest.

Here’s an example: Special test IDs are required to test this software. I wasn’t told this. And in some cases the special test IDs are different in each different environment. I wasn’t told this. These IDs are the defaults in the Test Companies so if I was able to use the test companies this probably wouldn’t have been an issue. However, Simon insisted I use the real companies to do the testing. This required a deep understanding of how the software worked at a deep level. Simon didn’t explain anything that would have given me the type of understanding that I would need to troubleshoot issues. Each and every company works differently based on a complex set of properties assigned to that company. Some are assigned through the database. I was told this. Others are assigned through other means. I wasn’t told this. Simon told me that companies worked differently and showed me where the properties were assigned. Presumably I was supposed to figure out the rest of it by osmosis, mind-reading, or something else, including what the IDs were. Only in one case were the IDs listed as properties and that case didn’t come up until recently. So, I had no way of knowing that my tests wouldn’t work and no way of knowing what the IDs should be until after I had wasted hours/days on trying to get things to work and Simon finally deigned to give me the information.

Of course, he was expecting me to get all ticked off since the intent of this was to frustrate and anger me and incite a big drama.

Instead I just ignored the bullshit, did the best I could under the circumstances, and put a kibosh in the whole scam without a single confrontation by scoring 100% on the AODA Training and Quiz.

Shawn appeared to have clued in quickly to the fact that I’d pretty much destroyed their slander (implied or otherwise) that I have trouble learning (meaning I’m stupid) with independently verifiable evidence to contrary. It took Simon a little longer.

I stayed home Tuesday and Wednesday and in bed.

When I returned to work on Thursday, Simon (presumably feeling a little desperate now) asked me a couple of casual AODA type questions likely hoping I wouldn’t know the answers so he could accuse me of cheating. I did know the answers and would likely to be able to answer any questions quite thoroughly related to the training material. Too bad for Simon.

Slander Two. It’s my fault I got sick because I don’t look after myself in accordance with the superstitions the critics advocate for:

This came from Sugi. I began by pointing out (politely) how her claims weren’t correct and then stopped, just shut up and listened to her carry on her lunacy. Simon then backed her up by bringing the same issue up just as I was leaving for the day. Essentially they are both claiming that if one looks after oneself naturalistically one will never get sick.

Just before I left, I left with the comment that I respected everyone’s right to choose the type of health care and treatments that they were comfortable with and that people should also respect my right to do the same.

My parting words were something along the lines of: “I prefer to leave my health care in the hands of peer-reviewed science and not some superstitious old lady pulling roots out of her back garden.”

This shut them up. Whether it has done so permanently remains to be seen.

This Slander is important to the Reitman Cult because they have been bribing restaurant owners and servers to tamper with my food and coffee. I am being infected with some sort of bacterial infection as well as parasites and something that is bringing down my immune system. In the past, pesticides were used and this may still be occurring. It appears to be a cocktail of some sort intended to make me ill but not so ill that I’m non-functional. Ill enough that it’s difficult for me to function. Of course, one can only imagine the damage that has been done to my body given the fact that in the last ten years in particular I have been unable to remain uninfected for any period of time. And now, they’ve ensured, through the eHealth system that every Doctor I go to will be disinclined to provide me with proper treatment because of the slanders and false health information contained in my eHealth file.

They need to deflect attention away from this criminal act (Malicious Assault) that they’re perpetrating against me and back to me. This is also why so much energy and attention is focused on ensuring my test results are tampered with and my Doctors are negligent.

Last Ditch Effort. Make fun of me and demean me in people’s eyes by making me the brunt of personal jokes.

Simon decided to make a federal case out of joking about the fact that my generation wore bell bottoms and platform shoes which is apparently insanely hilarious in his eyes.

I responded to this one by simply saying I have no problem with laughing at myself.

I didn’t bother to point out to Simon that Platform heels are back in style. I’ll just let him make an idiot out of himself over that one .

Maybe he really is as stupid as he pretends to be….

This one has never worked but it’s an act of desperation and always appears as a last resort. A way of trying to get themselves off the hook they’ve placed themselves on with their abuse.

In the 1980s when this was tried at my Ballroom Dance School, it came back to bite the skanks big time. A small group of people (including Instructors) got ticked off at this alleged “humor”. So, they decided to see how well the skanks would take it if exactly the same thing were done to them.

The skanks blew their gaskets.

Apparently it was only funny when they did this stuff to me. When the same stuff was done to them it was allegedly mean.

Documentation: Came home from work on Friday to find some black rubbery material in my apartment door lock which got smeared all over my key when I opened my apartment door. It looks like the stuff they use when they want to copy keys. Good luck with that one. (I have special security keys which use encryption.). If the Super wasn't a moronic brain dead piece of white trash she'd know that since the Landlord uses the same type of key for the outside building locks.

Week 9.

A few weeks ago, I mentioned the incident where someone appeared to intentionally break my coffee cup and a skank (Sugi) ran into the coffee room and started chatting me up, all apparently intended to delay my return to my desk. At the time, I thought they may have gotten into my email because the password was different. I now realize that the password was different because I was originally assigned a different password to my email. Since it usually logs in automatically I wasn’t aware of that.

Which raises the question of why my return was delayed? My purse was on my desk but it didn’t appear to have been gone through. I can usually tell.

That leaves my cell phone. So, I have to wonder if they were cloning my SIM card. This would give them complete access to my phone, allow them to eavesdrop on calls, etc. My phone is password-protected so unless someone was looking over my shoulder at some point and saw the password (always possible) they couldn’t access it to install eavesdropping software on it.

I’ve looked and haven’t located any evidence of such software.

I have noticed that since this occurred I no longer receive cell phone spam.

Thursday morning when I came in, it looked like someone had been on my computer. I found a printed flow chart sitting on my desk. When I asked around about the flow chart  no-one seemed to know anything about it. I’m pretty sure I turned the computer off the night before but in the morning it was logged in under my name and then locked with the flow chart sitting beside it. It looked like someone had logged in around 7:30AM.

I’m not set up for VPN access to it so it was impossible for me to have logged in from home. Although I can see this as being a possible excuse for their security people to claim they have the right to access my home computer. 

I held on to it for the day and when I couldn't shed any light on it I put it in the bin for shredding. 

There was another day when I came in, that my email had been logged out. I mentioned it to Shawn whose reaction was that it wasn't a big deal (implying that I was being paranoid). I pointed out to Shawn that there was nothing personal in my email so I didn't care from a personal perspective. However, given the concerns that the company has about Security I thought he should know since it indicated that someone had been on my computer.

Of course, his reaction tells me that the most likely intruder was Shawn or someone acting under Shawn's instructions. Since he was so unconcerned about a possible security breach, I have to assume he not only already knew about it but was likely involved with it somehow.

It looks like my activity is being monitored daily now and there is almost always a car sitting outside of my apartment with someone in it when I leave. That car doesn’t appear to follow me directly though or if they are, they’re using GPS. This week it’s been a black car with an old guy in it. Looks like he’s in his 70s. Laura’s Daddy perhaps?

One morning I saw three different cars parked at various locations on my route and when they saw me it looked like they were texting something on their cell phones.

No more police cars have made any appearances this week.

The only morning there wasn’t anyone was the morning I went to the Courthouse for Jury Selection. I was asked to appear Monday afternoon and Tuesday.

Yes, despite the phony criminal record, and the fact that I reported it existed but was false and that I was planning to challenge it, I was called for Jury Selection. Why? Who knows. There were two obvious skanks sitting there. They bypassed the people registering us and just sat down as though they belonged there. The guy registering me asked everyone whether they would be available for the week. When I got there he asked me if I would be available for the afternoon. Lol.

Presumably they just wanted to make sure I was off the list for three years? In which case all they had to do was claim that I wasn’t eligible until the false criminal record was cleared.

So, why do this? I have no idea. They’re Psychopaths and completely Loony Tunes. I’m sure they’ve fabricated some paranoid rationalization in their twisted minds. Since I’m not a Loony Tunes Psychopath it’s often difficult for me to figure out what scam they’re running at any given time.

I don’t doubt I’ll find out eventually.

I bought a coffee from the mobile truck that stopped by which was foul and tasted like the crap that the Reitman cult bribes people to put into my coffee. One skank was quite surprised when I didn’t drink it and asked me why. I said it tasted foul and then I tossed it. She asked me how much it cost and looked at me like I was some sort of criminal for wasting the 1.50 (approx.) that I spend on it. Then she made a federal case about the fact that everyone else was drinking it. I just looked at her and didn’t respond.

The response that went through my mind was that even if it was just bad coffee and not tampered with, I’m not a stupid mindless sheep and I have standards. Just because other people don’t, does that mean I shouldn’t? As my friends mother used to say, “If everyone else decides it’s a good idea to jump off a cliff does that mean you should do it?”  According to morons like this skank, apparently you should.

Returning it and politely asking for another cup almost always just nets me two bad cups of coffee and wild-eyed false complaints about my alleged “attitude”. Why should I set myself up for that crap?

I simply ignore it and get on with my life. I’m not interested in playing these stupid skank games. Apparently these sickos have nothing better to do, which is pretty pathetic when you think about it.

Anyway, it just comes down to this: Stupid people do stupid things and it’s not smart to follow stupid people. That’s how cults are built and it’s how malicious persecution campaigns like this can be perpetuated. It takes stupid people in large groups who are willing, mindless sheep.

And it’s a fact that 50% of the population has below average intelligence.

Anyway, when I went back to work on Wednesday, the senior people were continuing their meetings off-site and Wednesday was pretty quiet.

On Thursday, presumably since I’ve been avoiding lunches with the skanks, two guys from the Support Team, a Muslim guy and a white guy came and sat with me. It looked like they followed me out since I’ve never seen them having lunch that early before. The Muslim guy and another friend of his joined me on Friday.

It seems that the white guys are not encouraged to associate with me presumably because anything ugly they do can be interpreted as racist.

Anyway my strategy is simply going to be to stop talking. I think I’ll bring a good book to read .

On Thursday, after I came back from lunch, Kirk, the Team Lead of the Support Group, announced to the Support Group that ManuLife is now one of their clients. My work area is right next to theirs and he said it loudly, presumably to ensure that I heard.

The senior people came back looking all sparkly, happy, and gleeful. The executive, Andrew, in charge of IT was hanging out at the Admin Assistants desk, very animated, kept looking at me gleefully, while telling her some happy tale. Judging by the body language I’m assuming I was part of the happy tale.

On Friday everyone came back from their “OE” meeting very subdued (which piqued my interest) and Simon was in a panic about something he had to get done so was unavailable to help me troubleshoot.

Of course he wouldn’t have to help me troubleshoot if he wasn’t withholding necessary information about what I was working on.

The theme this week is that they really need documentation so it looks like they’re going to try the angle of she’s incompetent or a security risk (whichever works) so let’s have her do documentation and take her out of programming.

Of course, they’ll have to convince me that it’s a good idea first since they hired me as a Developer ;-D.

These skank scenarios require that they not only convince everyone to target the victim on baseless grounds but that the victim also see themselves as incompetent or a lesser person, etc.

It’s bullying and it’s intent is to demean and destroy the person both in their own eyes and in the eyes of everyone else.

It only works if the victim lets it work. We can’t control how anyone else perceives us but we can control how we perceive ourselves. And frequently, how we perceive ourselves impacts on how others see us and whether they consider what is happening an injustice or not.

This perception of injustice occurring may not help in the immediate situation since everyone needs their job and few will stick their necks out when their jobs are on the line, but it can help the victim in a Law Suit situation, in the long run, in various ways.

So, it’s important to not fall into the trap of believing the perception that these psychopaths are trying to create about you. It’s also important for you to come up with ways for people to see the injustice that is occurring (or see it as an injustice) whether they speak up about it or not.

The reality is that they may not say anything at work or to you, but they’re watching and they’re telling their family and friends about it and many of them are likely even outraged by it. The word is being spread about what is being done to you whether you are aware of it or not. People can’t and don’t shut up about this stuff.

This is the reality that the Psychopathic Loons are missing and they can’t control it no matter how many people they threaten or attempt to abuse into silence. They can’t even control by attempting to create the perception that you’re a threat to the participants because it almost always becomes abundantly clear to most skanks and fringe participants that everything you’re being accused of doing is being done by them.

I have had people come to me years later and mention some skank thing that had occurred previously. Those people have given me some insight into the background of what was really going on. Insight that I didn’t have at the time. And these individuals were genuinely disturbed by what happened and their personal involvement in it.

This is how I’ve been able to fill in some of the blanks in past situations and why I can provide so much detail. People are telling me these things. While there certainly is some speculation and guesswork in the situations, 80% of what I’m stating in my Personal Story is independently verifiable fact and in many cases 99 to 100% is.

Many of these same people and others may well come forward if a Law Suit were to occur and those people are the ones who could provide the evidence which would lead to Criminal charges against the Organized Stalking cults like the Reitman cult and their racist Goon Squad, the JDL.

Let me just say, that there is no-one more antisemitic than the Reitman cult who are Kahane Chai extremists and racist to the core. They think nothing of targeting and maliciously persecuting other Jews as well as non-Jews who don’t agree with their extremism and racism.

They also think nothing of recruiting any and all racist, extremist, and/or criminal organizations to execute these malicious persecution campaigns. Right wing, Left wing, Muslim, Jewish, Christian, Religious Cults, White Supremacist, Black Supremacist, Italian Mafia, Russian (Jewish) Mafia, etc. Anyone on the fringe who will take bribes, favours or just already hates the particular group the target might be a member of. And if they have, or they have cult members who have, government and police/intelligence/defense connections, they will bribe them to engage in corruption and abuse of power to execute these malicious persecution campaigns as well.

Psychopaths have no boundaries. That is what makes them insane lunatics.

In the US they had the good sense to list both Kahane Chai and JDL on their International and Domestic Terrorist Watch Lists. While Canada has listed Kahane Chai on their International Terrorist Watch List, they appear to be blissfully ignoring the fact that JDL is the Domestic version of Kahane Chai. And note that despite their deceptive denials, there is no difference between JDL (US) and JDL (Canada). Even some of their members are the same. The reason that JDL (US) moved their headquarters to Toronto, Ontario, Canada, and merged to become JDL (Canada) was to escape FBI scrutiny. 

Week 8.

This week has been interesting to say the least.

What it indicates to me is that the skanks and the corporate whores still haven't come up with a plan on how to proceed with their malicious persecution campaign. They start to make moves in one direction, back off, try another direction, and on and on.

I smell a lot of fear and apprehension.

Sugi, the Indian woman who was hired at the same time I was, and who appears to be a skank, wanted to chat about my recent interest in refreshing my Linux skills.

This appears to have the Reitman cult on the alert and I smell more desperation in the air.

Sugi’s questions really tell it all:

Sugi. What companies use Linux these days?
Me. Companies with Enterprise level systems like Google.
Sugi looks surprised and very concerned.
Sugi. Do you have any resources you can go to in order to get help with Linux other than the person you are working with now?
Me. Lots. I know numerous Linux geeks online and have for years.
Sugi looks surprised and very concerned.

I smile and return to work.

Note that I have corrected the grammar. Sugi isn’t that well spoken.

This is actually the second time she brought up this theme so I’m assuming she was hoping to propose a gaslighting campaign.

Previously, she asked me if I had any relatives in IT. Of course, I have quite a few and said so.

The reasoning behind these questions is that if I have trustworthy sources I can use to vet information it becomes very difficult to gaslight me by misinforming me about technology related things and demanding that I act in accordance with the misinformation or attempting to manipulate me into doing so. And yes, doing this sort of thing does constitute work place bullying because it makes it difficult for the victim to do their job properly.

This was something I was asked to do when I worked for Cyril’s sons company. I told my boss that he was wrong and that by doing what he asked I would be hurting the company. I said I would do it if he insisted but I would do it under objection and would say so if asked. Of course he backed off.

It also means that they can't easily fire me by falsely claiming that my skills are poor because they can't guarantee that I can't find someone who will not only refute them but support me publicly.  They can accomplish this with people who don't know me but would be risking getting caught and being publicly exposed if they approached someone who knew me well and/or had a bond with me. A family member would be particularly risky for them. They can't afford to have anyone come directly to me with reports of their behind the scenes manipulations. What they do with people who are closer to me is attempt to discreetly manipulate them. They do this with my kids all of the time as well as other family members.

They are currently going with the "obfuscate everything as much as possible and pretend it's because Simon is ignorant and can't speak english" approach. Essentially they overwhelm me with useless details while holding back anything important. The details they do provide are presented in such a confused mess that they are meaningless but they can claim that they gave me the information. This week Simon appears to have been intentionally misdirecting me in the information he gave me for the Software Design document he asked me to create as well as obfuscating and withholding information relating to another project I was working on.

While psychopaths who stalk are considered a little more intelligent than your average criminal, when you consider the intelligence of the average criminal, that really isn’t saying much.

Anyway, rumour has it that all of the meetings on Monday and Tuesday were “brainstorming” sessions to come up with ways to advance the company. I don’t doubt for one second that the issue of how best to maliciously persecute me without ending up on the Perp Wagon or ticking off the Reitman cult, came up as well.

I found it interesting that the suggestions mentioned in the newsletter sent out by the Owner didn’t include mine.

After all, why would they want to actually give me credit for anything despite the fact that the information I gave them may well have prepared the company to survive a possible disaster that could have put them right out of business.

No doubt that this new technology may just die quietly, in which case, there will be no impact on them.

If it doesn’t, the fact that they now know about it, thanks to me, means that they can be ready for it.

None of this has apparently redeemed me in their eyes since Sugi and others are still looking for ways to get to me.

Follows is examples of the bullshit I put up with and ignore.  This infantile nonsense is intended to annoy me and try to incite a reaction out of me.

If I make even the most minor and calm, reasoned complaint, it will be exaggerated way out of proportion, a huge drama will be fabricated by others (not me) and an incident report will be fabricated based on the fictional, over-dramatized version of events and not what actually happened.

Since I’m a grown-up, unlike these mentally deficient and mentally ill stalkers, I ignore this stuff and just try to get on with doing my job despite their attempts to interfere with my ability to do my job rather than train me and enable me to do my job.

1. Not only has my work area not been cleaned once by the cleaning staff but someone has been coming to my desk when I’m not there and making little coffee messes.

I just clean it up myself.

2. I’m located in such a way that my chair is in the aisle, so anyone walking behind me tends to hit my chair. Twice this occurred intentionally and the person (sarcastically) apologized.

I told her not to worry about it. It didn’t bother me. And it really doesn’t. I have too much general contempt for morons like this to let their bullying and abusive behaviour get to me.

3. Brada, the apartment superintendent has been up to her tricks again to try to justify gaining entry to my apartment when I’m not there.

1. She fabricated an incident where the pipes in the apartment below her were blocked (most likely by her since she has access) pushing the water up into the persons sink and causing some minor flooding.
2. She then lied to the Landlord, claiming that she could hear what sounded like a clothes washer running in my apartment.
3. She banged on my door like a little Nazi in jackboots, on Sunday evening to the point where the skank across the hall opened the door and objected. She then lied again, implying that I was deaf, that my TV was on loud and she wanted to make sure I heard the knock. I heard it, knew it was her and ignored it. I don’t open the door for her anymore after the incident last summer. She knows this. She can phone me if she needs to talk to me. Since all of my calls are recorded I will then have evidence of what she said.
4. She came back on Thursday evening and did the same thing. I ignored her again.
5. She went downstairs and phoned me. I answered the phone.

Brada. Do you have a washer and dryer in your apartment?
Me. Yes, but I don’t use it.
Brada. Someone has been using one and I’ve checked all of the apartments except yours.
Me. I don’t use it and never have.

She, of course, knows that I have a washer and dryer in my apartment and knows that I don't use it. She lives right downstairs and would hear it. So, when she claimed she heard it she was lying since I wasn't running it and haven't since I moved in.

The landlord has asked us not to use that type of equipment in the building because the plumbing isn't designed to handle it. I have respected his wishes the entire time I've lived here.

I decided to call the landlord directly. I made a few points with him in addition to pointing out that I have lived here for 11 years, and never used my washer or dryer, so why would I start now? I also told him that he or his son were welcome to come to my apartment and take a look.

I tend not to let thieves, liars and racists like the Superintendent into my apartment voluntarily.

4. Simon took my cup. The company gives the new hires one as a gift I guess. So I had nothing to drink my coffee out of. One minute he told me took it and the next minute he told me he didn't have it while it was sitting in plain view on his desk. I went without for a day and asked him for it back the next day. He just gave me a stupid vacuous grin and told me I could get another one from the receptionist. He also had his own cup on his desk. Don't ask me what that bizarre behavior was all about. I have no idea. I got another one from the receptionist and dropped the issue. That was just too weird. Perhaps they're planning to fabricate/spin some insane fictional incident around it or use it rationalize some frame-up. Who knows. These people are infantile lunatics.

5. Simon keeps chatting me up and claims to want to discuss philosophy, etc. I just make sure I take my lunch early and thereby avoid any invitations to lunches.

The intent here is to get to know me so that they can come up with lies to spread about me that are essentially spin but with just enough “truth” in them to give them some credibility. The method is:

1. Find out what I think about something.
2. Fabricate/Spin a story based on that, which takes what I said and converts it into a bizarre, extreme position which is then used to support the pathological lie that I’m “nuts” or justify some bizarre and extreme act that they’ve framed me for.
3. Fabricate/Spin a story based on something innocent I’ve said in order to demean, smear me and incite hatred against me.
4. Go to extreme lengths to criticize something innocuous and innocent that I do or say.

Note that the things I do and say are well within the normal, average range. I'm a very middle of the road person with no extremist or unusual beliefs and ones which are shared by many others.

This is not something the Reitman cult can say about themselves despite the face of normalcy that they work very hard to present. They are Kahane Chai extremists but try to spin the Kahane Chai position as not being extremist.

The Reitman cult uses the method of: “Whatever I do is wrong” or they replace the “do” with “say”.

So, they take innocent, innocuous, middle of the road normal things I say or do to their most bizarre, extreme, claim that I believe the most bizarre, extreme version they’ve spun and then use that to rationalize their malicious persecution of me and to incite hate against me.

In logical argumentation, this strategy is known as fabricating a Straw Man.

They would also love to have some IT people on board who they could incite to launch an Organized  CyberStalking/CyberBullying campaign but up until now their recruits have failed miserably at it.

I don’t doubt they’ll try again and I would expect that both Simon and Shawn will be the Cyber Goon Squad Leaders under the command of Doug Salomon, David Williams and Graham Marko. The Goon Squad will consist of any IT people that they can recruit from their circles including other company employees.

Just to elaborate a little on one point….

The reason the Reitman cult gets their skanks to do the sort of thing I mentioned in Item 2, is because when I was in my 20s I was the victim of domestic violence. It wasn’t extreme but it was enough to make me leave the marriage. For a few years later I was a bit jumpy when people made sudden moves near me, especially if they were angry.

I’ve been over this for years.

However, the Reitman cult, in their typically brain dead stupidity cling to old stories and try to use these things to “psych” me out. That is, to create an environment of psychological stress. They do this because they think the entire world is like them. Too stupid to change. 

It has no impact on me but does give me ammunition to back my claims of malicious persecution and bullying since these acts fit right into those categorized as the acts of bullies.

The Reitman cult (and Loony Lorna) also appear to, rather stupidly, think that:

1. everyone is a victim to their own psychology
2. everyone is a victim to their psychological environment in general
3. everyone’s psychological state is fixed.

I can’t think of a more foolish interpretation of the role of psychology in the life of an individual. It belies reality and explains why their silly psychological games have never worked on me. Even when I was a naive young 16 year old teenager and they were mature, adults in their 30s. It definitely  explains why their lame attempts to get their niece to recruit me into a weird Indian cult when I was 16, failed miserably. One that they were financing through their niece (and likely continue to finance).

It also demonstrates that they have no clue whatsoever about my psychology or human psychology in general for that matter.

In my experience, only people who are seriously mentally ill, who have extreme disorders like psychopathy which includes narcissism or associated disorders like histrionics amongst other obsessive, mood and personality disorders are this psychologically fixed.

Most normal people are self-aware, understand the impact of their behaviour on others, and are capable of change. If they act to harm someone they have to be given a valid reason to do it.

And this is precisely why Organized Stalking cults like the Reitman cult expend so much energy and resources into framing their victims as well as targeting their own skanks and blaming the victims for it.

In order to recruit members of the general public, who may not be as mentally deranged as they are, this is a necessary step.

Once this is accomplished they work on psychologically controlling and manipulating their skanks like any cult.

Irrespective of their personal delusions, the world isn’t the way they perceive it. Only they and other brain dead psychopaths like those who join their cult are.

And this, combined with their intense fear of getting caught is their greatest weakness and will be what leads to their downfall.

It took me years to learn this but I’m using this blog to share this information with other victims intentionally.

I want people to understand this so that those who are new to their victimhood have both the insight and the tools with which to fight back against the Organized Stalking cults that are targeting them.

The leaders of these cults are all the same. They fit a clear and identifiable behavioural profile whether they are high level government officials like Gottlieb (the person behind MKUltra) or whether they are rogue agents or whether they are wealthy deranged dilettantes or whoever they are.

[Summary from the] ... FBI's Crime Classification Manual:

    Non-domestic stalker, who has no personal relationship with the victim
    Organized (based in a calculated, controlled aggression)
    Delusional (based in a fixation like erotomania)
    Domestic stalker, who has had a prior relationship with the victim and feels motivated  to continue the relationship; this constitutes around 60 percent of stalkers and the aggression often culminates in violence.

Stalkers tend to be unemployed or underemployed, but are smarter than other criminals. They often have a history of failed intimate relationships. They tend to devalue their victims and to sexualize them. They also idealize certain people, minimize what they are doing to resist, project onto people motives and actions that have no basis in truth, and rationalize that the target person deserves to be harassed and violated.

If, when I was 16, I knew what I know now, these guys would have been carted off in a Perp Wagon long ago.

And it may yet happen.

Or maybe I'm just dreaming again.

Who knows ....

Week 8. Monday and Tuesday.

My, my. Such busy little beavers this week. All yesterday morning their higher level people were in meetings. 

I worked on my assessment of the technology I had discussed at the meeting last week, which the Owner had asked me to do a little research on, emailed it to him in the morning and forwarded a copy of the document to my boss.

They came out of the meeting and worked for a couple of hours after which time everyone left for another meeting which appears to have gone into the evening since no-one had returned by the time I left at 5:30PM. Since my boss was wearing his coat when he left I'm assuming the meeting was being held off site which was rather interesting.

Today they were all gone most of the day returning late this afternoon.

Now, they've started the nitpicking. Asking me questions which were leading, about minor, petty issues, but ones which employers always use against employees when they want to work place bully them out of a job. Essentially what they do in campaigns like this is:

1. whatever you do, it's wrong
2. no-one else allegedly does it (which is usually a lie)
3. they turn a blind eye to everyone else who does it
4. people will lie to cover up the fact that others do it

They do all of this so that they can make a federal case out of minor things and use those minor things to get rid of you.

Of course, the alleged source is always some skank employee, and the company is always allegedly just "innocently" responding to a "complaint" which was brought to their attention. And, of course, since that same skank employee isn't complaining about anyone else, well there's allegedly no reason to investigate whether or not others are doing the same thing.

I'm assuming that this apparent change (and I'm not entirely sure they have made a change) is because they were given the heads up about my blog comments (or they're actually reading it) and decided to back down from the "Security Breach" scam? Or, they're just keeping their options open? Or, they've decided to pick the least of the possible evils?

They really don't have any outs here. Anything they do to get me out of this job constitutes work place bullying. That's a fact.

I'm not incompetent and that is the only legitimate reason to fire someone.

It's possible that they've decided they want out of whatever web Loony Lorna and the Reitman cult have tried to entangle them in but then they should just keep me on instead of dumping me and give me a fair chance. If they don't believe the loons then why continue to go along with them.

I don't doubt that the technology I brought up was at least one of the topics being discussed given it's potentially significant impact on their business.

It would be nice if they showed a little appreciation for that. Particularly given the fact that it was patently obvious that they didn't have a clue that it existed. I did them a huge favor by pointing it out to them. The least they could do is show some gratitude by keeping me on.

Besides, people really need to start to take a stand against psychopathic lunatics.

That's what will eventually stop them in their tracks, not going along with them, even if it's just to get yourself out of a mess they've put you in.

Their best out, and mine, is to keep me employed with their company.

I've actually proven this is true on a news group I moderate. We have a policy that everyone goes along with and many people like.

We don't pander to drama queens.

The more noise the drama queens make, the more we ignore them, and if they injure someone in some way we ban them permanently from the site. Multiple times if necessary.

If they have a problem they have to make a case for it, providing objective and independently verifiable evidence to back it up. Whether that problem is with a person or a policy. It doesn't matter.

Psychopaths usually run off with their tails between their legs. The gutless, yellow-bellied cowards simply can't take the heat. As soon as they start to play their nasty games they're identified, analyzed and publicly confronted on their machinations.

Of course, we adhere to our own standards and provide objective and independently verifiable evidence to back up our claims about them. On a news groups where posts are written down, the record, evidence and history of their activity remains public and can be referenced.

For a while some were getting sneaky and deleting their posts from the web site. This was particularly amusing since the moderators and some others get our posts in our email which they can't delete. So when they lied about something in complete confidence because they thought they'd  deleted the evidence of their lie, someone would always be able to forward it from their email thereby exposing the lie.

They can't handle being publicly exposed and when they are they slither back under their rocks.

That's the way to deal with them. Not by pandering to their pathological lies.

Documentation:

1. Every Monday for the last three weeks a police car has appeared behind me, followed me for a short time, and then driven off. They appear to be intentionally trying to draw my attention to them.

2. Yesterday morning, a dark car stalked me all of the way to work and this morning a silver car was stalking me outside of my apartment and down the street. The driver looked like the same woman both times. When the one in the silver car noticed me looking at her and her license plates she drove off in the other direction and didn't stalk me.

Presumably she didn't want to have her picture taken and be identified as a stalker engaging in criminal harassment.

Not surprisingly she looks just like a female skank who identified herself as Laura Brooker and was a participant in my Business Plan Workshops last year. She apparently has a relative in the OPP and a brother in IT. She has tried to "friend" me several times on LinkedIn and I just reject the requests. The last time was she tried was two or three weeks ago. She is allegedly starting a mobile Concierge business based in Oakville.

I guess that includes Stalking for hire.

The timing is particularly interesting since she couldn't possibly have known that I was leaving early for work today unless she was told by a select few people. Only my co-worker and a couple of people within hearing range, as well as anyone they spoke to, knew. Yes I have her plate number noted down.

I'm wondering if Loony Lorna was encouraging someone to act as an alleged "independent witness", in order to back up her pathological lies by having them stalk me to work and spread pathological lies to my employer that would support Loony Lorna's lies. Of course, this constitutes criminal harassment if someone did that as well as criminal collusion, so most likely they've given a phony name and will disappear from the scene at some point.

I wonder if that was what the meetings were about?

This type of activity is typical of Organized Stalking rings because the lies they tell are so outrageous that normal people won't believe them unless they hear them from different sources with fabricated "evidence" to back them up.

The Machiavellian Machinations of deranged psychopathic loons know no bounds.

3. For the last week, TekSystems has been calling me all of a sudden about a job they want me to interview for. TekSystems has been pandering to Loony Lorna and two of their employees are the adult children of a friend of hers. The second child tried to join my LinkedIn page two weeks ago and of course I not only ignored the request but removed all of the TekSystems people from my page.

Since that didn't work I guess they decided that I might be more inclined to trust the skank if the one contacting me was a minority female from the same group as I am. She's called me five times and I've ignored all of her calls.

I'm not a racist like they apparently are.

I have equal opportunity contempt for all skanks irrespective their color, nationality, culture and belief systems.

A skank is a skank is a skank.

I have more in common with, and far more sympathy and compassion for people (male and female) who are white, as well as other minority individuals who are targeted than I do for minority skanks who are particularly despicable creatures, in my opinion.

Anyway, if I had to hazard a guess here, I'm thinking that Loony Lorna is desperately trying to get me into another company that might be more inclined to engage in criminal collusion with her.

Just a thought. I don't really know but I'm not biting.

I think I'll ask TekSystems to remove me from their database. I've already dumped RHI (Robert Half International). If these corporate whores want to engage in criminal collusion with the morally bankrupt likes of Loony Lorna and the Reitman cult they won't do it with my cooperation.

They're also despicable creatures and I have no use for them either.

4. Simon was chatting me up about technology and making numerous ignorant statements. I corrected a couple of them and then decided to just shut up. I can't make up my mind whether he's being intentionally ignorant or really is that ignorant. He seems to want to provoke me into disputing him. I just smiled and dropped it.