Legislation to make Organized Stalking Illegal Is A Necessity!

Legislation to make Organized Stalking Illegal Is A Necessity!

"What is hateful to you, do not do to our fellow man. That is the entire Law, all the rest is commentary."
— Talmud, Shabbat 31a, from the Judaic tradition


Tuesday, February 11, 2014

The Day We Fight Back Against Mass Surveillance #NSA #StopSpying

Electronic Frontier Foundation

Dear Kitty,

Take Action
Big news. Today, the Internet is uniting to fight back against mass surveillance. 

The political landscape has shifted dramatically since the first Snowden leaks last June. We’re at a key moment in the battle against those who want to scoop up all your private personal information, whether it’s the NSA, or other countries’ spooks, like Britain’s GCHQ or Russia’s FSB.

Will you sign onto our global petitionopposing mass, suspicionless surveillance? 

It’s crafted by legal experts from around the world and lays out principles for restraint, oversight, and specificity for engaging in surveillance. Your signature will give weight to a new legal framework for policymakers that will lead to modern surveillance laws that will protect individual privacy rights, instead of trampling them.

You’ll be standing with over 360 activist groups from Colombia to Uganda, dozens of world experts, and thousands of your fellow Internet citizens.

Please help spread the word.

In addition to signing the global petition, you can share on social media using the hashtag #StopSpying.

You can also help us by installing this code on your website, which will install a banner urging visitors to oppose mass spying.

There are also protests, discussions, and cryptoparties being organized around the world.See if there's one in your area.

Back in the USA, we're fighting for you

Thanks to supporters like you, EFF has been fighting NSA surveillance in American courts. We're attacking Internet surveillance programs as illegal and unconstitutional under US law, and we're representing 22 organizations in challenging the phone records surveillance program on free speech grounds.

This is bigger than just the US, though. We’ve explained to states at the UN and the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights the implications of the NSA’s spying on the privacy rights of everyone, at home and overseas. And we’re teaming up with our fellow activists around the world to make sure everyone is free from unchecked snooping, whether it’s from the United States’ dragnet spying, or your local surveillance state.
Stopping the NSA from collecting emails like this,

Rainey Reitman
Activism Director
Electronic Frontier Foundation

Sunday, November 24, 2013


Please note that I am not responsible for or involved in any way with the following blog:


While it used the same template as mine and quoted content from this blog, it did so because the author of that blog (someone else) chose to make it appear to be similar to mine.

I have modified my template to a personalized one in order to make the differentiation clear and to ensure there is no confusion created on this.

Wednesday, June 12, 2013

Skanks Signing Petitions Using My Email Address Fraudulently

Today a petition was signed using my antiorganizedstalking email address. Letters were automatically sent to the President of the US and the following:

President Obama
Representative Pitts
Senator Casey
Senator Toomey

This particular site does not require a log in and password and as a result anyone can put in anyone's email address.

The email that is sent confirming the signature and emails sent does not contain a link to the original petition so one can't even go back and provide a reference so that one can have their name removed and a correction letter sent.

No doubt the skanks have been active yet again.

I did not sign this petition nor do I agree with the content of it.

I will be filing a formal complaint regarding this and asking that an investigation be done.

This site should also be taking steps to prevent this type of abuse or at least allow the victim to have a means to mitigate against it.

Wednesday, May 1, 2013

The Need for Silence

From time to time, readers of this blog may have wondered why anyone should be so determined to silence and discredit the principal blog author as seems to be the case.

Well, given that those involved have financial interests in Canada's biggest security companies, the fact that the Canadian government has lost track of $3bn of anti-terrorism funds since 9/11 may be a useful clue. (See second article on page which the link goes to. The first article is not completely unrelated, in that it's probably not the US Taxpayer who benefits most from the detention camp at Guantanamo remaining open, but assorted security and infrastructure contractors with excellent lobbying power.

Monday, February 18, 2013

Steroids, Sex and Dodgy Tickets

Most victims of organised stalking, like most victims of protection rackets, will have experience of some police officers willfully ignoring, or even participating in, the flagrant criminality involved in these activities. Even some users of illegal and borderline legal sexual services will have been surprised to find themselves dealing with policemen as soon as there is any sort of argument between prostitute and client! And anyone unfortunate enough to live near an active brothel or massage parlour, probably doesn't need to be told about the association between such establishments and certain officers. Indeed, many who've been rash enough to complain about the local brothel, will have found themselves having far more encounters with policemen than they ever had before.

The beleaguered victims can very easily, and very quickly, gain the impression that the whole of their local police service is corrupt and complicit in the crimes being committed against them, and that it's counter-productive to report crimes to the police. Which, by itself, would seem to answer the question of what stalking gangs and other criminal rackets need corrupt policemen for. It's not the whole story, though:

Criminal gangs do not like policemen, and would not willingly give even a corrupt policeman a minute's oxygen to breathe unless they needed him for something. (Or the policeman in question was not only corrupt, but given to seizing the initiative and put the criminals in a position of having no choice but to cough up. Such completely criminal officers do exist, but are much rarer than ones who are simply weak and corruptible.)

For the purposes of stalking, criminal gangs cannot really do without at least some corrupt police officers, or at the very least civilian employees in police control rooms or data centres. It is an essential part of organised stalking that the victim get no effective help from the police, and since many officers join the force in the hopes of helping citizens and not simply sticking to the letter of the law, the situation where stalking victims get no help from the police, cannot happen by accident and it needs work. The exact same thing applies to victims of protection rackets, loan sharking or blackmail: these crimes simply collapse if the police start helping the victims. If any of these crimes are regularly happening in your neighbourhood, there's no room for debate: someone in the police must be corrupt. It isn't possible to run these rackets for long if the local police are allowed to be effective. There might be cases where a large proportion of officers are corrupt, but that would mean the criminals would have to spend prohibitively on bribes, and it isn't essential that the whole force be bent, merely that the criminals should have enough bent officers in the works to ensure that their victims remain hung out to dry.

But there is another, until recently neglected, market for corrupt policemen, and it is also one which can place the corrupt policeman in a somewhat stronger and more lucrative position than if he is simply being the "bitch" of the local criminal hard man. Criminals have to deal with each other now and then if they are running brothels or protection rackets, and practically all the time if they are dealing drugs or other contraband. Criminal gangs may have a code of loyalty within the gang, but as soon as another gang, distributor or smuggler has to be dealt with, they encounter a significant risk of betrayal, theft or murder.

The fact that crime is run by criminals who can't be trusted, threatens to depress the criminal economy as much as crime routinely ruins the mainstream legitimate economy. What the criminals need, is their own police force, to guard them as they conduct risky transactions. (And give both parties an impression, false though it may be, of fair play and mutual security.) This is the marketplace where a corrupt officer can be very nearly king and not simply a stooge. Quite by chance, ATF agents in Atlanta uncovered the scale of this market, and this led to an FBI operation which made several arrests and brought daylight into at least the top of the termite mound. Police acting to police and regulate criminal transactions seems to be a new discovery for the current generation of US Federal Agents, but their nineteen-twenties forebears would have been expecting precisely this kind of arrangement -and they'd have gone looking for it from the start.

The officers involved in this kind of corruption are likely to at least feel as if they have control of their relationship with organised crime, though they'd be fools to believe that such a blissful situation will prove permanent. But what of the other corrupt police officers, the ones who genuinely are stooges and hapless pawns of the local strong man. How do they get into such a mess, and how does Mr Big find them out?

By Their Weaknesses

Policing is a dangerous business, and morally weak men may be frightened as they go about their duties. The correct and only sane way to deal with this is to attend to training, equipment and procedure, so that risks are assessed and controlled. But there is a tempting shortcut, and that is to use illegal body-building drugs, so that with a minimum of actual work, the officer acquires a more impressive physique, which may help deter attack, but certainly serves to make him feel more confident in facing danger. Unfortunately, there are downsides:

Such drugs are illegal (for a number of very good reasons) and can only be obtained from professional criminals, although these will almost certainly appear merely to be helpful and "connected" members of  the local gymnasium. Steroids share with cocaine and cannabis, a tendency to give the user an entirely misplaced confidence in his own abilities and judgement, at the same time as seriously undermining both. Most serious is the risk of the user suffering what is known as "droid rage", which can turn even a pillar of society into a violent maniac.

The helpful employee or fellow member at the Gym who supplies an officer with body-building drugs, will also be supplying the local criminal community with details of the officer's habit and weakness. The local criminals will know that the officer is weak, and will be willing to see if he has other weaknesses they can help him with. And if an officer commits a violent crime in a droid rage, so much the better. An officer in this position is on the hook more thoroughly than any other. Indeed, it's quite possible that a criminal gang would confront a steroid-abusing officer with a contrived opportunity to go over the edge with someone they found expendable, for the sake of gaining complete and permanent control.

Being a police officer is also a position of power and authority, particularly over highly vulnerable people on the street. Officers who are corrupted by their power into abusing it, perhaps by demanding sexual favours from street girls or other vulnerable groups, will feel anything but weak when they do it. But there are others preying upon those vulnerable individuals and they will swiftly know all about the corrupt officer's abuses. And then they really have got him.

See this link.

And this one.

And this one too.

The young officer who thought he was running a steroid supply racket on his own account, was in control of things only in his own head. He was a user, too. In control of nothing.

It would appear that police professional standards units could very nearly blood-test corruption out of the force. If, of course, they could guarantee that neither corrupt officers nor their criminal masters could compromise the sampling procedure or the laboratory results.

Interestingly, some of the reader comments on the article about the cadre of corrupt officers in the Atlanta area, suggested that some of the officers who have been arrested have a long history for handing out quite unreasonable tickets for motoring offences. The issue of tickets, either false ones with the fine being pocketed, or unreasonable ones that can be withdrawn for a small fee, is a classic entry-level crime for a corrupt officer. But a police officer will find it as difficult to be only a little bit corrupt, as a woman finds it to be only a little bit pregnant.

Thursday, January 10, 2013

Web Of Lies

"All this was inspired by the principle--which is quite true within itself--that in the big lie there is always a certain force of credibility; because the broad masses of a nation are always more easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional nature than consciously or voluntarily; and thus in the primitive simplicity of their minds they more readily fall victims to the big lie than the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little matters but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods. It would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and they would not believe that others could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously. Even though the facts which prove this to be so may be brought clearly to their minds, they will still doubt and waver and will continue to think that there may be some other explanation. For the grossly impudent lie always leaves traces behind it, even after it has been nailed down, a fact which is known to all expert liars in this world and to all who conspire together in the art of lying." —Adolf Hitler , Mein Kampf, vol. I, ch. X

 Of course Hitler, being a typical Psychopath accused his victims of engaging in this practice, and so rationalized his own use of it in that way.
Now, unlike Hitler and the Reitman cult, I don’t generalize one person’s and/or their social circle’s behaviour and attribute it to all of the members of the religion, culture or creed that they belong to unless there is something inherent in their belief that they are acting on.
In other words, unlike Hitler and the Reitman cult, I neither practice nor do I believe in bigotry as a rational reaction to one person’s and/or their social circle’s treatment of me.
The Reitman’s were outraged by the Holocaust no doubt, as were many Canadians. It happened before I was born but I grew up knowing about it and understanding what a horrific crime it was.
Yet the Reitman’s reaction to it, like most Psychopaths, and unlike most of of the rest of us, including the Jewish community, appears to have been to generalize their abhorrence of this crime to blaming all Germans including housewives who had little or nothing to do with anything that happened in Germany. And so, we had the Greta Goede drama which I believe was a frame-up involving police criminal collusion with the Reitman’s and at their behest. So, like Hitler, they rationalized their bad behaviour by claiming their victim, a lone housewife who was relatively poor, knew very few people, and had no voice, was worse, and then framed her on those grounds.
Not surprisingly the rumours of Mengele’s presence at Allen Memorial Hospital in Montreal at the time doesn’t appear to have bothered the Reitman’s much. At least not enough to track him down and frame him for anything. It’s not surprising because psychopaths are also cowards and will never target anyone who might actually be a challenge. They prefer to target the defenseless and those who have no voice.
In my case, they are desperately trying to ensure that I am isolated and have no voice and therefore defenseless against their criminal acts and abuse. It’s taken them over 40 years and they still haven’t succeeded.
“‘Tis strange – but true; for truth is always strange; Stranger than fiction.” -- British poet Lord Byron (George Gordon Byron) In his epic poem Don Juan (1819-1824)

The way that they are doing this is to fabricate a complex and dense web of lies where one lie builds upon the next and the next and so on. In other words they are attempting to not only rewrite my history but who I am and how I’m perceived in my world.
This is being accomplished through the illegal and criminal falsification of numerous government records (e-Health, Passport, false Criminal Record, etc.), a community wide personal smear campaign, an IT wide professional smear campaign, identity theft and impersonation used mostly to frame me for various things and to make me appear unstable, etc. My entire public real life image has been fabricated by the Reitman cult web of lies.

I have never had direct contact with either Psycho Cyril or Dotty Dorothy Reitman other than the time he threatened me directly and the times he’s appeared in my vicinity. 
Why would anyone in their right mind want to do that to someone they don’t even know directly? Don’t the wealthy have better things to do? After all, the Reitman’s and their social cult of family members and friends are probably quite charming to everyone’s face. They give money to charity, serve on boards of charities and help raise money through fund-raising efforts, etc. Why would such “nice” people bother doing such a thing. It’s unbelievable.
Or is it just their Mask of Sanity? The one worn by psychopaths throughout their lifetimes.
"You’ve seen these people in action, working their nefarious brand of charm, wit, and charisma. They operate largely unnoticed—until they don’t, at which point it’s usually too late, because they’ve already insidiously laid claim to your faith, your livelihood, or maybe even your life. No, we’re not talking about Canadians. We’re talking about sociopaths, those creatures who, through their grand schemes of contrivance, manipulation, and deceit, seek to undermine the very fabric of it all because, well, they can." –Interview Magazine. The Sociopath Next Door.
When you understand what psychopaths are and how they think and behave, their behaviour makes perfect sense and the extreme hate in my community of Brampton against me also makes complete sense.
The allegations that I’m mentally ill and do crazy things is the basis of the rationalization made by the Reitman cult and their bribed skanks including the bribed rogue police officers, of why I’m hated. Of course, they’re the one’s running around bribing skanks to convince the community of these lies.
Their rationalization is the one that makes absolutely no sense and is incredibly bizarre. The bizarreness of the claims made against me are one of the standard and consistent aspects of this situation and the source of those are the Reitman cult.
However, that fact will not stop the Reitman cult and their skanks from screeching their strange and bizarre accusations against me from the roof tops so that any attempt by rational people to explain why it’s irrational or any attempt by me to calmly and rationally present the facts, will be drowned out in the general hysteria and drama that they have intentionally created. This is one their core strategies.
This is how they operated with Greta Goede and this is what they’re trying to do with me.
Claiming that my community allegedly hates me because I’m crazy and allegedly do crazy things is quite farfetched and that is what simply doesn’t make sense. People don’t hate members of their communities who are mentally ill. More often than not they go out of their way to help in some way even if they may not be inclusive towards them. A small minority will exhibit hate and fear but the majority do not react to a mentally ill person in the way that my community has reacted and is continuing to react to me.
That is simply not normal.
And if a person really is mentally ill then why would you have to frame them, smear them, lie about them, impersonate them, etc. to drive that point home? You wouldn’t. They would be demonstrating their mental illness by their own behaviour. And note, that there are numerous things that I’ve been falsely accused of that I can actually prove were not done by me. If I can do that, what rational person would assume that the other things that can’t be proven one way or the other are going to be true? A rational person would assume they aren't true.
So, there has to be a rational explanation for why a local police officer who doesn’t know me, has no problem with issuing false traffic tickets to me. Then when I object, an attempt is made to threaten and intimidate me. When I don’t back off the local police officers’ friends not only begin to spread rumours that I’m crazy but they spread those rumours directly to the judge and prosecutor involved in the case of the traffic ticket I’m disputing in an apparent attempt to prejudice them against me. There also has to be a rational explanation for why a judge and prosecutor who don’t know me would risk being seen as engaging in malicious prosecution by handling my case in an unusual way after this occurred. And if there is a rational reason, other than the one I’m providing I’d like to hear it and I’m pretty sure I can debunk it pretty quickly.

Normally what would happen is that the police officer simply wouldn't appear in court, the case would be dismissed and everyone would get on with their lives. The lawyer who evaluated the facts agreed with this rational assessment. 

Yet this isn't what happened? Why not? 

Given the context of my life the only explanation can be that the Reitman cult is playing one of their sleazy games of disinformation and deception for the purpose of implementing yet another scam in my life. The false tickets didn't work. I caught them in that particular little game and they don't like to be exposed. I've also effectively prevented them from continuing with that particular little game by purchasing a car web cam. I don't expect to get any tickets anymore.

Past experience has demonstrated that whenever there's a spate of ticket issuing by the police it's inevitably the result of the Reitman cult having succeeded in influencing the police by either buying the Police Chief or buying rogue police officers usually at the higher levels. Without cover and back up at the higher levels, lower level police officers would be fired for the corrupt, unprofessional and unethical activities (as well as frequently illegal activities) that the Reitman cult demands of their skanks. They rationalize this through their morally bankrupt belief that "it takes a thief to catch a thief". According to that bizarre and frankly, seriously sick logic the police should become serial killers if they want to catch serial killers.
One can only wonder what else is going to happen. If the Reitman cult acts according to their usual patterns of past behaviour, both the judge and the prosecutor or just the prosecutor will receive threats and be harassed in some way by the Reitman cult who will then falsely accuse me of committing the crimes they’ve committed. The judge is male so the Reitman cult (being the cowards they are and unless they have some dirt on him) will likely target the prosecutor. She’s a mature, attractive blonde who will receive a lot of sympathy if she either becomes a genuine victim of the cult or criminally colludes with them by pretending to be victimized by me.
By the time they’re done a minor traffic ticket case will become a tempest in a teapot, an eventful drama and the talk of the courthouse and police force in Brampton. And it’s that drama that will be used to establish this lie everywhere in those locations. Once this lie that I’m “crazy” is established and the prosecutor is established as an alleged victim of mine, the Reitman cult would be hoping against hope that this will give them the push they need to have me falsely accused of being mentally ill.

An accusation based on nothing more than malicious rumour-mongering by people who are being paid to smear me and their friends who have been convinced the lies are true and have jumped on the propaganda band wagon. Of course this could result in me being falsely incarcerated into the Psych Ward at Brampton Civic Hospital or North York General, where they have some bribed rogue medical skanks on the staff who have already set the stage by spreading this rumour around for a few years now. The one's in Brampton have been ensuring that my e-Health file is infected with their pathological lies and those of my past GPs.

I'm not saying this will happen. I'm saying that if things played out like this, it would be consistent with their past behavior. It's frequently the case that when I expose the Reitman cult scams before they happen that they back off because they're chickenshits who are afraid of getting caught. However, since they seem to love their superstitions and seem to think numbers are magical ... especially the number 13 ... I really can't be sure. Trying to predict the behavior of irrational loons like those in the Reitman cult is a challenge at the best of times by someone who is completely rational. Now that loony Lorna Marsden and the rather retarded Doug Salomon have taken the reigns there's an additional layer of looniness that has to be worked out.
Oddly enough, neither the Judge nor the Prosecutor appear to have a problem with the unethical and unprofessional behaviour of the police officers involved. After all by going along with it, they’re effectively condoning and enabling it. If they did have a problem with it they wouldn’t have gone along with it at all and at the very least chastised the police officers for being unprofessional.
Or perhaps they’re just going along with the game plan like everyone else because it’s easier to “go along to get along” than it is to “go against the tide” and do the right thing.
Personally, I think it’s about time that the wealthy elite and their bribed skanks were reigned in and held accountable for their criminal acts and their abuse of the vulnerable.

That is what the Justice systems real job is after all. Not catering to the deranged whims of psychopaths who happen to be members of the wealthy elite and their bribed rogue skanks no matter who they are.
“Oh what a tangled web we weave, When first we practice to deceive” --Sir Walter Scott quotes (Scottish Novelist, Poet, Historian and Biographer, 1771-1832)
Given the fact that equal justice is for all is what we're supposed to have in Canada.

Going along with this type of abuse of process for any reason simply puts the Canadian Justice system not only into disrepute but sinks it to the level of justice available to those in the Third World.

Fascists like the Reitman cult and their skanks may not have a problem with that but I certainly do.

Monday, January 7, 2013

Reitman Cult Instigated Police Harassment

Some of you are already aware of the continuing saga of false police tickets and police harassment that has been instigated against me by the Reitman cult through their bribed rogue police officer skanks in my community.

You are also aware of the continuing saga of hatred that’s incited against me based on the cult fabrications of my alleged mental illness which are dutifully spread everywhere by the bribed rogue police officer skanks and other community skanks.

Here is an overview of what happened in this one particular situation (amongst many that have occurred) and what the current status is to give you an idea of the type of bullshit that occurs:
  1. On August 28, 2012, I was stopped and ticketed at 8:45AM by a police officer who claimed that I had run a stop sign. 
  2. I hadn’t so I decided to dispute the ticket and arranged for a meeting with the Prosecutor on November 23, 2012. 
  3. On November 23, 2012, I went to my car to go to my meeting and found gasoline poured under and around my car. 
  4. I went to my meeting and told the Prosecutor that I hadn’t committed the offense and was disputing the ticket.
  5. The Prosecutor set a trial date for January 4, 2013.
  6. On January 4, 2013 I went to court and the following occurred:
  • The police officer did not appear. Usually the case is dismissed when this occurs.
  • While waiting for the case to be heard, a police officer (not the one who issued the ticket) approached the Prosecutor and asked a question which I didn't hear. The Prosecutor mentioned my name and showed him the court documents. He laughed and said "she's crazy".
  • The case was put forward to May 4, the judge indicated that he would note "unable to reach" on it and indicated that the reason it wasn't being heard was they ran out of time.
I found this behaviour both unusual and offensive so I contacted a lawyer to ask for advice. I asked the following questions.
  1. Isn't it standard practice to simply dismiss the case if the police officer doesn't show up? This would have taken the same amount of time it took to move the case forward to a new date [and is what has occurred consistently in the past - added for clarity and not part of the original question posed to the lawyer].
  2. Isn't it prejudicial for any police officer to approach the prosecution and make a comment like "she's crazy" regarding a case and referring to the defendant?
  3. Can I have the case dismissed on the grounds that it was improperly handled and/or prejudiced?
Lawyers Response (emphasis mine):
I will answer your questions individually, in the order in which you've posed them.

[1] Dismissing case of officer does not show:
In order for the trial to have proceeded, the prosecutor would have needed that officer to have testified and provided evidence to support the ticket.

When an officer does not attend on the required date, the prosecutor has the discretion to withdraw the ticket, as the source of their evidence is not present and, perhaps in the interests of justice, they do not think a new date is necessary. As you've indicated, for minor traffic matters, it seems to be common for the prosecutor to withdraw the ticket if the officer does not attend.

However, they do NOT have an obligation to withdraw it. For example, they may ask the Court for an "adjournment" of the trial date in order to procure the witness into court. This is a request they would have to have made to the Court.

The bottom line is, on it's own, the fact that the prosecutor did not withdraw the ticket does not mean any error was committed.

[2] Comment from Police to Prosecutor
The comment made by the police to the prosecutor, while unprofessional, certainly would not amount to an impropriety that could be grounds to have your ticket dismissed.

With respect to the officer, a complaint to the police division at which the officer works seems to be the only remedy. This, however, would not get you very far.

With respect to the prosecutor, as long as they do not treat you unfairly, engage in a malicious prosecution or abuse their process, they can listen to the police bad mouth an accused any day and all day.

Although this kind of behavior certainly doesn't put the justice system in a positive light, unfortunately there's likely nothing that can be done about it.

[3] Removed advice on ways to get the case dismissed

I hope that helps. If you have any further questions about it, let me know.